Looking back at the Predictions

I do a good bit of forecasting in my real job as a tax accountant.  I get that sometimes you can have a plethora of information, take everything into account, and the projection you come up with still varies greatly from the actual results.  There is a science to predicting future results, but it is an inexact science.  Believe me, I have had more than my fair share of misfires when it comes it comes to projections.  I get it that predictions and projections are just that and they almost always differ from reality.  If any of us could predict anything with 100% accuracy, then well, we would. Of course, none of that is going to stop me from pointing out the many baseball pundits who were wrong – in some cases way wrong – in their 2012 preseason predictions for the Baltimore Orioles.  I fully admit to taking a little bit of pleasure every time the O’s leave a national writer’s preseason predictions in the dust.  I won’t even attempt to justify this pleasure, beyond making this one point – just because forecasting is rarely 100% accurate it does not mean that people should be immune from criticism and questioning when the predictions do not pan out.  In the accounting world, you will often hear the acronym “SALY” – which stands for “Same ALast Year”.

Analysts without Analysis

This isn't a post where I complain about the "lack of respect" shown to the Orioles following their 14-8 start. I don't expect the national media to all declare in unison that after 22 games in April, that they were all wrong before the season and that the O's are for real. I don't expect them to say that because I wouldn't say that. I am not sure any O's fan would really make such a bold proclamation just one month into the season. We all want to see how the O's do against the elite of the American League - Yankees, Rays, Rangers, and Tigers. We want to see how well the starting pitching and bullpen holds up as we get a little further into the season. It is still way too early to know for sure whether any team's April is indicative of how their entire season is going to play out. So I get all of that and in no way expect anything other than skepticism from the national baseball media. Having said that, if baseball reporters and analysts **are** so inclined to discuss the O's hot start and whether it is sustainable, it would be nice if they actually provided some insightful analysis rather than just spouting unsupported opinions.